I recently purchased an (very) early Triumph Bass in Switzerland. It is all black with a white binding, and has the pickup with the 2 not adjustable pole-pieces magnets for the E and A string (see picture). After disassembling the bass, I cleaned and polished all parts. 3 screws are not original, the nut and endpin is changed (they are from a double bass), and the potentiometer for the volume is missing. I also have the support-mount. The electronics/pickup works as it should - I already ordered a new potentiometer and an vintage framus volume-knob :-). After reassembling, the bass got new Thomastik Spirocore light strings. I think its a wonderful instrument and sounds unique!
However there is one problem I really face: the playability. The action (Saitenabstand) is very high. This is due of the bowed neck (its not twisted), which was surely more straight in the 50s :-). Without string tension the neck is about 5-6mm bound forward - with string tension about 1cm. There is no chance to get a better action lowering the bridge holes - because of the up bow of the neck. I am a double bass player and know that I cant handle this by myself - only a prof. doublebass maker should lend a hand on this.
Because its some kind of "historical" instrument, and maybe rare (?) - especially early builds - I want to know if my TriumphBass should stay at it is - with the original painted neck - however its very hard to play and wont see any gig in the future. Do you think - if possible - a new fingerboard/neck will destroy the original feeling and diminish the value of the bass?
Let me know what you think. I will post some more HQ-pics soon.
Cheers,
Werner
Kommentar